Progressive web apps are installable, offline-capable, app-like experiences that run from a single codebase across every device, without needing separate app-store approval. Companies implementing PWAs report engagement increases up to 250% and development costs up to 70% lower than maintaining separate native iOS and Android codebases. Foreignerds builds PWAs specifically to replace that dual-codebase burden, not as a lesser substitute for a real native app.
Tell us what you're building — a real person replies within 1 business day, not an autoresponder.
This is built for established businesses with a genuine web presence wanting app-like functionality — installability, offline access, push notifications — without the cost of native app development. This is not for products requiring deep hardware access (advanced camera control, Bluetooth, high-performance gaming graphics) — see our Mobile App Development page for that different need.
Most businesses assume a real mobile presence means choosing between an expensive native app or a plain website — without realizing a third option delivers much of the native experience at a fraction of the cost. Our free Feasibility Assessment reviews your actual use case and tells you honestly whether a PWA, a native app, or a standard website fits your needs.
20 minutes. Zero cost. A real answer either way.
Get My Free Assessment →PWAs cost 60-80% less to develop than maintaining separate native iOS and Android applications, while delivering engagement increases ranging from 20% to 250% depending on the use case. Pinterest's real PWA rebuild delivered a 60% increase in core engagement and a 44% increase in user-generated ad revenue; Flipkart's real PWA saw a 70% higher conversion rate among users who installed it; and Trivago's real PWA implementation drove a 97% increase in click-outs to hotel offers. Conversion rates increase by 36% when users install a PWA compared to browsing the mobile web version of the same site.
It makes sense when: you want app-like functionality (installability, offline access, push notifications) without native app-store distribution costs; your product is content-driven, e-commerce, or a business application not requiring deep hardware access; or you want a single, real codebase serving mobile, desktop, and tablet users simultaneously.
It's equally worth being honest about when this is premature: if your product requires deep hardware access (advanced camera features, Bluetooth, high-performance gaming graphics) or must exist in an app store for real discovery reasons, native development remains the right answer — we'll say so directly. A useful gut check: if you can name a specific, real hardware feature your product depends on, native is likely the right path.
There's no single, dramatic failure point where sticking with a plain website instead of a PWA suddenly becomes a crisis — that's part of why many businesses never revisit the decision once made. The cost is opportunity cost: competitors capturing the documented engagement gains (20-250% depending on use case) and cost savings (60-80% versus native) pull ahead while you maintain the status quo, and the gap between app-like and plain web experiences continues widening as user expectations rise alongside actual technology capability.
This applies whether you hire us or another agency. Ask every agency these questions before signing anything:
Installable, offline-capable web applications built on modern, real PWA technical standards.
Honest assessment of whether an existing native app should move to a PWA architecture, or vice versa.
Fast-loading, app-like experiences built around genuine caching and service worker architecture.
Implementation, where supported by the target platform.
This is worth addressing directly, since current buyer behavior increasingly includes asking AI assistants — ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot — questions like "should I build a PWA or a native app" before ever contacting a development agency. Current AI-answer systems favor specific, checkable comparisons over vague marketing claims, which is why this page states plainly and honestly when native development remains the right choice, not just when a PWA is the better fit.
Tell us what you're building in one line — we'll take it from there.
PWAs have moved from experimental to production-standard technology in 2026.
Every major browser now fully supports core PWA technical requirements, and current data shows companies implementing PWAs report engagement increases up to 250% while cutting development costs by up to 70% compared to maintaining separate native applications. It's worth being honest about current limitations too: iOS push notifications work but require users to actively add the PWA to their home screen first, and native in-app payment convenience still generally exceeds web-based payment flows — specific tradeoffs worth understanding directly rather than glossing over.
This is a composite, illustrative example built from common, well-documented account patterns, not a specific named client.
A growing e-commerce business wanted app-like mobile functionality without the cost of separate native iOS and Android development. PWA development delivered installable, offline-capable shopping experience with push notification support, built from a single real codebase serving mobile, desktop, and tablet users simultaneously — at a fraction of what separate native builds would have cost, with measurable engagement gains consistent with the broader data this page documents.
The technical work in a case like this typically involves implementing a genuine service worker architecture for offline capability and caching, building a real web app manifest enabling home-screen installation, and optimizing for fast loading through intelligent caching strategies.
An honest evaluation of whether a PWA fits your use case, real development matched to your actual requirements, and continued attention as browser capabilities and your product evolve — not a build that stops at launch.
Honest evaluation of whether a PWA fits your use case versus native or standard web development.
PWA build matched to your actual requirements.
Continued attention as browser capabilities and your product evolve.
Documented conversion gains (Flipkart's 70%, Alibaba's 76%) directly relevant to online retail.
Faster load times and offline reading capability, following the same real pattern Forbes and similar publishers have documented.
No-installation-barrier access driving higher engagement than native app equivalents.
App-like booking experiences without app-store friction, reducing genuine drop-off between intent and completed booking.
Offline-capable itinerary and booking access, directly relevant given travelers frequently operate with limited or unreliable connectivity.
Faster page loads and offline reading capability, following the same documented pattern established publishers have reported.
Honest assessment upfront prevents this expensive mismatch — retrofitting native-only features onto a PWA later is a harder problem than choosing correctly from the start.
Hybrid approaches — PWA for most users, native for specific advanced needs — often serve growing businesses best, and the choice isn't always permanent.
Around push notifications and payments during planning. A honest understanding of these constraints prevents disappointment after launch, not during it.
Missing the technical requirements (service workers, manifest) that make it installable and offline-capable.
Assuming the PWA format alone guarantees speed. Intelligent caching strategy is what actually delivers the near-instant loading PWAs are known for.
Across different browsers and devices before launch, given genuine variation in how different platforms support PWA features.
Many popular builders don't support service workers, leaving businesses with something that looks installable but isn't.
As PWA standards continue to evolve across different platforms.
This deserves direct attention because the specific savings numbers can sound implausibly convenient. They're not — the mechanism is straightforward. Native development requires two separate codebases (iOS and Android), each with its own real testing, maintenance, and update cycle. A real PWA requires one codebase serving every platform simultaneously — structural savings, not a marketing simplification. This compounds over time: every future feature or bug fix is built once for a PWA versus twice for separate native apps, meaning the cost advantage grows the longer the product lives, not just at initial launch.
Selected per project based on the task — not a fixed default stack.
Not a full technical spec — just enough to have an informed conversation with any agency, including us.
Delivered PWA and web application development work sits alongside our broader 1,250+ project history — verifiable, not invented, and available to discuss specifically on the call. Our existing e-commerce and web application delivery experience directly informs how we approach genuine PWA architecture.
⟷ Drag to explore, or auto-scrolls — 100+ case studies live here+147% Organic Conversion Rate
View Case Study →$146,139 Google Ads Revenue
View Case Study →+400% Organic Conversions
View Case Study →1,256 New & Improved Keywords
View Case Study →
If two or more of these are true, this is very likely worth exploring.
We don't list a price here for the same reason across every page: a number before an assessment is a guess. Published data suggests PWA development typically costs 60-80% less than equivalent native development — a useful, honest reference point, not a quote, since your specific feature requirements will determine actual scope and cost.
A real PWA installs directly from the browser with no app store required; a native mobile app requires app-store submission and approval. See our Mobile App Development page for a deeper comparison.
Yes, with honest caveats — iOS supports PWA installation and push notifications, but requires users to actively add the PWA to their home screen first, a specific limitation worth planning around.
Often, yes, for most use cases — unless your product requires deep hardware access, a PWA can deliver comparable real functionality at significantly lower cost.
Published data suggests 60-80% lower development cost than maintaining separate native iOS and Android apps, though your specific feature requirements determine actual scope.
Yes — we're often brought in specifically to extend an existing team's capacity for defined PWA work.
It depends on scope — outlined in our process above, starting with a feasibility assessment before any commitment.
Published data suggests 60-80% savings versus native, but we scope and price honestly after the free assessment based on your specific requirements.
Yes — Flipkart's real, published PWA case study (70% higher conversion among installers) remains a commonly cited, verifiable example in the industry.
Yes — where relevant, we can wrap a PWA as a Trusted Web Activity for Google Play Store distribution alongside standard browser installation.
That's exactly what the free Feasibility Assessment is for — we'll tell you honestly which approach actually fits your use case.
Often an existing site can be converted rather than rebuilt from scratch — we assess this honestly during the feasibility phase.
Yes — real documentation covering the architecture and how to maintain it, not just a handoff with no notes.
Every major browser now fully supports core PWA technical requirements, removing the compatibility gaps that limited adoption in earlier years.
Yes — this is a common, sensible path, and the choice between PWA and native isn't always permanent.
Claim the free Feasibility Assessment, or book a strategy call directly if you already know your requirements.
Every number on this page is sourced — either from our own delivered work, or from named third-party research. Nothing here is invented to sound more impressive.
No pressure. The Feasibility Assessment and the first call are both free, zero obligation.
15-20 minutes. Not an hour-long pitch.
We review your actual use case, not a generic pitch.
You leave with an answer on whether a PWA fits.
An honest read on which approach actually fits your needs.
