Flutter vs. React Native: A Comprehensive Comparison
Flutter vs. React Native: A Comprehensive Comparison

Flutter vs. React Native: A Comprehensive Comparison


In recent years, hybrid application development has gained prominence in the mobile application development industry, overshadowing native development. This shift has been driven by changing business needs, including rapid growth and increased demand. Among the leading frameworks that have emerged to support this trend is React Native, introduced by Facebook in 2015. Prior to this, options like PhoneGap existed but were met with lukewarm reception due to certain limitations, particularly its reliance on the C# programming language.

The Rise of Hybrid Application Development

Several factors have contributed to the surge in demand for hybrid application development:

  1. Cost and Time Efficiency: Maintaining separate development teams for different platforms can be costly and time-consuming.
  2. Developer Availability: Finding skilled developers, especially in regions like Asia, where Apple has a smaller market share, can be challenging.
  3. Platform Dilemma: The abundance of popular platforms can make it difficult for businesses to choose where to focus their efforts.

In response to these challenges, the concept of cross-platform mobile applications was born. While numerous solutions are available, two standout contenders in this field are Flutter and React Native. This article aims to explore the strengths and weaknesses of both frameworks, ultimately addressing the question of whether React Native is poised for obsolescence.

React Native

React Native is a robust JavaScript framework developed by Facebook. It empowers developers to create impressive applications for both iOS and Android platforms. Built on the foundation of React, Facebook’s JavaScript library for user interface development, React Native adapts its focus to mobile platforms.


Introduced by Google in 2017, Flutter is a novel hybrid mobile application development framework. It relies on the compiled programming language Dart, which Google introduced in 2011. Flutter enables the rapid creation of a diverse range of critical applications.

One of Flutter’s standout advantages is its utilization of Dart. Applications built with Flutter can run seamlessly on both Android and iOS platforms, boasting exceptional performance.

Differences Between React Native and Flutter

Having introduced React Native and Flutter, let’s delve into their key differences.

User Interface

React Native: React Native offers a UI experience akin to HTML without CSS frameworks. This approach allows developers to build on native components for both Android and iOS, resulting in a superior user experience. It benefits from a vast community and third-party libraries that expedite development.

Flutter: Flutter provides built-in UI elements called widgets. These widgets serve as the building blocks for shapes, graphics, and animations in applications. Developers can swiftly customize UI using Material Design widgets for Android and Cupertino widgets for iOS. While this approach allows for rapid iteration and app development, community support for widget development is somewhat limited.


React Native: React Native applications face challenges in rendering large datasets due to their reliance on a JavaScript bridge. Performance can be improved using third-party libraries, but in the competitive landscape, React Native falls short of Flutter’s performance capabilities.

Flutter: Flutter applications excel in performance due to the use of Dart, one of the fastest compiled languages globally. Unlike React Native, Flutter does not require intermediate bridges for application execution, enhancing its overall performance.

Development Time

React Native: React Native benefits from a variety of third-party libraries that simplify UI design. It eliminates the need for separate files for complex UI support, reducing development time and streamlining workflows. Developers can swiftly create cross-platform applications.

Flutter: Flutter’s primary drawback is the necessity to create separate code files for Android and iOS platforms when constructing complex UI elements. Customizing UI elements requires Dart programming skills, demanding extra effort from developers. However, once the UI is designed, it delivers a superior user experience on both platforms compared to native applications.

Community Support

React Native: React Native boasts a thriving community with extensive support, making it the most popular framework on platforms like Stack Overflow. It is entirely open source, and numerous blogs and forums assist beginner programmers.

Flutter: Despite being around for almost two years, Flutter has yet to garner the same level of support for the Dart programming language on Stack Overflow. While community support may be limited, Google’s Flutter developers maintain excellent documentation that is beginner-friendly.

Code Structure

React Native: React Native excels in segregating logic, navigation, and design within applications. This separation facilitates the development of complex mobile applications, making React Native a preferred choice among developers.

Flutter: Flutter does not segregate data, template files, and UI elements because it relies on Dart as the core programming language for UI development, even in complex applications. Consequently, everything remains inline.


React Native currently enjoys steady growth, robust community support, well-defined code structure, and widespread developer adoption. In the case of Flutter, its potential for the future of mobile app development is promising, with the equation “Flutter + Dart + Large Community = Recipe for Success.” However, concerns about Google’s track record of discontinuing open-source and acquired products have left some developers hesitant.

In summary, React Native and Flutter each have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them depends on specific project requirements and developer preferences. This article aims to provide clarity on the main differences between the two frameworks and their future prospects.

If you found this article informative, please show your appreciation by clapping, providing valuable feedback, and sharing it with your friends.

© 2013 - 2024 Foreignerds. All Rights Reserved