Benefits of Using Xamarin App Development
Benefits of Using Xamarin App Development

Exploring the Future: Will Web Components Replace React?

In the realm of web development, change is the only constant. Over the past year, React, with its declarative approach and component-based architecture, has surged ahead of jQuery in popularity, according to Stack Overflow’s survey, which drew participation from over 80,000 developers. Its robust features, encompassing data binding, event handling, and state management, have cemented its position as a powerhouse in the web development landscape. However, as React celebrates nearly a decade of success, it’s essential to acknowledge its limitations and consider whether emerging technologies like “Web Components” could potentially challenge the dominance of UI libraries like React.

Pros of React


React offers developers the freedom to make choices across various aspects like CSS, JavaScript, TypeScript, global state management, and more, without imposing a rigid structure.

Declarative, Component-Based API

React’s modular development approach is exemplified by its clear component structure, especially evident in its coupling of JSX.

The Virtual DOM and Reconciliation

React’s core strength lies in its reconciliation mechanism, where an in-memory DOM tree efficiently manages changes, optimizing rendering.


React has consistently delivered exceptional documentation, setting the stage for related frameworks and libraries.


A thriving community of engineers surrounds React, boasting a multitude of contributors and a wealth of open-source projects, including component libraries, that streamline UI development.

Cons of React

Unopinionated (Again)

While React’s flexibility is an asset, it can also be a drawback, leading to a lack of standardization, particularly in handling styling, rendering, and state management.

Frequent Major Changes

React has introduced significant changes in a short span, such as hooks and the deprecation of class-based components. While these improvements may benefit experienced developers, they can be daunting for newcomers and disrupt ongoing projects.


Despite various optimization options, React-based websites often suffer from suboptimal initial page load performance, as highlighted by tools like Lighthouse and Web Vitals.

Pros and Cons of Web Components

Pros of Web Components

Native Browser APIs

Web Components leverage native browser technologies, reducing code complexity and improving web page performance by minimizing reliance on prescribed frameworks.

Isolated DOM

Each Web Component’s DOM is self-contained, preventing conflicts and providing a controlled environment.

Scoped CSS

CSS defined within a Web Component’s shadow DOM is isolated, eliminating style conflicts with the rest of the page.


Web Components encourage the design of declarative, markup-based APIs for components, enhancing reusability.

Simplified CSS

Scoped DOM simplifies CSS, enabling the use of straightforward selectors and reducing naming conflicts.


Web Components promote thinking of applications as modular chunks of DOM rather than monolithic pages, enhancing development productivity.

Cons of Web Components

Sparse Open-Source Projects

While there are noteworthy Web Component-based projects, they are less prevalent compared to those in the React ecosystem.

Sparse Documentation

Although valuable documentation exists, there is no centralized repository, making it challenging for developers to assemble knowledge.

Unknown SEO Implications

The SEO support for Web Components remains uncertain, with mixed results reported on the internet, which may deter some from adopting this different approach to web page construction.

JavaScript Fatigue

The rapid evolution of JavaScript technologies can induce “JavaScript fatigue,” as developers struggle to keep up with an ever-changing landscape, potentially driving a shift towards prioritizing native browser APIs.

The Future: Web Components vs. React

JavaScript fatigue is a real concern in the ever-evolving world of web development. The increasing number of JavaScript frameworks can overwhelm new developers, diverting their focus from mastering core technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Moreover, web page performance often suffers due to excessive unused CSS and JavaScript. In response, the future of UI web development might lead to a world with fewer frameworks and a stronger emphasis on native browser technologies. While UI frameworks like React will persist, they are likely to align more closely with browser APIs and features.

In conclusion, Web Components are poised to play a significant role in the future of UI development. While it’s unlikely that UI frameworks will disappear entirely, they will likely evolve to integrate more seamlessly with native browser technologies. For React enthusiasts, the advice is to continue using it but remain open to exploring Web Components. Below are some noteworthy Web Component projects gaining traction:


Lit is a straightforward library for building fast, lightweight web components. Its core offers a component base class that includes reactive state, scoped styles, and a concise template system, emphasizing speed and expressiveness.


Interfaces built with FAST adapt to your design system and can be employed with any modern UI framework by harnessing industry-standard Web Components.

Material Web

Google’s Material Web serves as a UI toolkit for crafting visually appealing and accessible web applications. Material Web comprises a collection of web components designed to enhance web development.


The future of UI development promises exciting possibilities, and both Web Components and React will likely continue to thrive in this dynamic landscape. The key lies in embracing change, staying adaptable, and harnessing the strengths of these technologies to create exceptional user experiences.

© 2013 - 2024 Foreignerds. All Rights Reserved